coloradvanced

Color Blindness

Reduced ability to distinguish certain colours, affecting 8% of males and 0.5% of females.

Plain English

Color blindness is far more common than most designers assume — roughly 1 in 12 men has some form of it. The most common type, red-green colour blindness, means success (green) and error (red) states look identical. The fix is simple: never rely on colour alone to communicate meaning. Add an icon, a label, or a pattern alongside every colour signal. This is not an edge case — it is a significant portion of your users.

Technical

Types: Deuteranopia/deuteranomaly (red-green, most common), protanopia/protanomaly (red-green, less common), tritanopia (blue-yellow, rare), achromatopsia (complete monochromacy, very rare). Design rule: ensure information conveyed by colour is also conveyed by shape, pattern, or text. Tools: Sim Daltonism (Mac), the Figma "Color Blind" plugin, Chrome DevTools accessibility pane (vision deficiency simulation). WCAG 1.4.1: "Use of Color" requires that colour is not the only visual means of conveying information.

Live Demo

Color only — inaccessible

No icon or label — fails for red-green colorblind users

Color + icon + label — accessible

!
Stop! Caution Go

Works for everyone regardless of color vision

8% of men have color vision deficiency. Never use color as the only signal.

Usage

✓ Good usage

Show form validation errors with: red border + ⚠ icon + "This field is required" text — three distinct signals, only one of which is colour.

✗ Bad usage

Showing a success state with only a green background and an error state with only a red background — indistinguishable to red-green colour-blind users.

Common mistakes

AI Prompt Example

Copy this into Claude, Cursor, Bolt, or v0.

Never use colour as the only signal for any status or state. Every error shows: red border + error icon + text message. Every success shows: green border + checkmark icon + text message. Every chart series has a unique marker shape, not just a unique colour.